Body fat came in lower than my bathroom scale implied!

2026-10-07 1084 views 2 posts

Honestly, been around here three years now, mostly lurking in the tracking threads. Finally did a DEXA last Thursday — partly curiosity, partly because I wanted something other than the bathroom scale to argue with.

The number that got me: 31.4% body fat, with lean mass holding at 128 lbs. My scale at home has been sulking around the same two-pound window since early spring, so I'd basically written off the last few months as a stall.

Turns out the stall was partly real and partly the scale being a bad narrator. Visceral fat came back at the 25th percentile for my age, which I did not expect at all. I've been lifting twice a week and walking most evenings since last fall, no dramatic program, just repetition.

What I liked most was having a number that isn't weight. I've kept a waist tape and a sleep log going for a while (shoutout to whoever started that tracking-waist-and-stairs thread months back — that reframe stuck with me).

Not saying scans are for everyone, and they're not cheap. But for anyone whose scale has gone quiet and made them doubt the work, it's worth knowing the two measurements can disagree.

Anyone else get scanned after a long flat stretch? Did it change what you tracked?

Honestly, congrats on finally doing the DEXA — that lower-than-scale number makes sense; bathroom scales are estimating and hydration can swing them a lot. One concrete thing I track alongside body fat is waist at the navel plus a couple of strength benchmarks, so one weird scale morning doesn’t derail me.

Gentle question: did the DEXA tech mention whether you were fasted/hydrated, or whether recent exercise could affect the lean-mass read? With lean mass at 128, are you using that as your anchor instead of chasing scale weight?